Yay or Nay: Kate Hudson's Red Carpet Style
I wanted to open this article with a picture of what we'll be discussing this week. I figured you seriously needed to get a good visual of this before we go anywhere with it.
Did I just see Kate Hudson's bum?
Yes, yes I just did and so did you.
Take a closer look at this gown. While at first glance it might seem like a lovely, peachy coloured bejewelled number, it is actually quite scandalous. There are some weird sheer strips running down the length of the gown in the front and back. There is also a slit in the back, which without the sheer strips would be nice, but together doesn't seem to fit. The neckline is a neat side halter yet she's got a lot of skin showing otherwise and I am not sure if it's necessary. The gown itself is beautiful and Kate is a gorgeous lady herself, so why all the bare skin on display?
What do you think of this gown? Should Kate be covering it up? She's a definite hottie, but I am really not sure we need to see her derriere to prove it. Would you ever wear a gown like this? Is this one a yay or a nay for you? Leave a comment below by September 9th and you could win!
(images via gofugyourself.com)
Facebook Comments
86 Comments
I heard on the radio this morning that she spent 6 hrs a day in the gym to get back from her baby body! that's just insane! I guess she wants to show off all her hard work?! | |
I think for having a baby recently, she must be feeling really good about wearing that dress. I know I would! | |
Yay! I agree, she does look stunning! She manages to pull this look off well! | |
| |
Just a bit too much. Too bad because it could have been gorgeous! | |
Yay! Kate has the figure for it so why not flaunt it. Besides it's not like she showed us a whole lot of her behind. | |
Nay. Would be prettier if it was less revealing | |
The dress is beautiful and she has an awesome bum, so why not? I feel like it's tasteful since the rest of her is covered up. | |
Nay...I know if you got it flaunt it...but...the "cheek-show" is a bit much. | |
|